Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Management Education
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1052562907310641v1
32/5/580    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Maher, L. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

An Expectancy Theory Motivation Approach to Peer Assessment

Barry A. Friedman

State University of New York at Oswego

Pamela L. Cox

State University of New York at Oswego, pcox{at}oswego.edu

Larry E. Maher

State University of New York at Oswego

Group projects are an important component of higher education, and the use of peer assessment of students' individual contributions to group projects has increased. The researchers employed an expectancy theory approach and an experimental design in a field setting to investigate conditions that influence students' motivation to rate their peers' contributions to team projects. Two questionnaires were also developed and tested by the researchers. This research found that rating format and rating frequency significantly interacted to influence student motivation and their perceptions of their team. Research findings reveal peer assessment to be a complex process in need of further study. Two peer assessment instruments and peer assessment training materials are provided along with suggestions for future research.

Key Words: peer assessment • teamwork • expectancy theory • motivation • group projects • evaluation • group dynamics

This version was published on October 1, 2008

Journal of Management Education, Vol. 32, No. 5, 580-612 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1052562907310641


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Business Communication QuarterlyHome page
P. L. Cox and B. A. Friedman
The Team Boat Exercise: Enhancing Team Communication Midsemester
Business Communication Quarterly, June 1, 2009; 72(2): 230 - 236.
[PDF]